Contact: bruceesaari@gmail.com

PROFESSIONAL CAREER:

B.A. Plus 135 Hours, Literature, University Of Washington

PhD, Humanistic Anthropology:  ADVISORS: Chistofer Badcock, Emeritus, Sociology, LSE; David Spain, Emeritus, Anthropology,  U of Washington.   Auspicies: Union Institute, Cincinnati

Recipient: Terman Award for “Outstnding Contributions to Teaching” Presented at Stanford University

Recipient: Fulbright Teacher Exchang, 1 year,Svendborg, Denmark

Bellevue International School–Co-founder, Humanities, Program Developer

Kirkland International Community School–Founder, Program Developer, Humanities

Marysville Arts and Technology H.S. Founder @ Start Up First Year Principal

“Bruce, The proof of any teacher’s effectiveness is in the performance of his students, and you and I both know that the work your kids have produced is superb. Their observation skills, their ability to use language to vividly describe their observations, and their rapidly increasing understanding of syntax and sentence structure are among the most impressive I’ve ever seen as an English teacher, principal, or superintendent in any school at any grade level or program.

The fact that you have produced this level of accomplishment with such young kids is incredible.

–Bellevue Supt. Mike Riley”

 Transform Your Student’s Writing Grades 7-12

  • Transform Your Students’ Writing Grades 7-12
  • To all teachers of writing, grades 7-12:
  • There are no shortcuts to raising student writing achievement within your classrooms.
  • How do we raise student writing achievement levels? How do we help students break through the barriers imposed by their limited entry-level language skills? How do we develop student enthusiasm for learning to write with clarity, precision and expressive power?
  • Daily oral language mini-lessons will not do it. Journal writing will not do it. Exploring writing genres, or teaching the five part essay will not do it. Neither will writing across the curriculum fulfill this expectation.
  • Assigning more writing is not the same as teaching students to become better writers. The study of rubrics and/or group-editing tasks do not teach students how to write more varied and more precise sentences. Before students can write to learn, they must first learn to write.
  • What students need is a systematic, single-focus writing curriculum that develops sentence fluency and descriptive power at the same time that it creates enthusiasm for word choice and clarity of expression.
  • Students need a sequence of writing activities that meets them where they are…and then lifts them upward to higher word choice and sentence construction skills.
  • Huge breakthroughs in student writing achievement require teachers to transform student awareness of language possibilities, and to equip them with the tools they need to move beyond self-limiting, entry-level language patterns.
  • These breakthroughs can best be achieved by a writing program that is lively, engaging, and that combines systematic, intensive skill development with short, high interest assignments that are designed for successful closure and quick turnaround. A program where students put in the effort, master a technique, and then instantly see their sentence construction skills grow.
  • This 7-12 Writing Curriculum is the product of over thirty years of teaching reading, writing and thinking at the secondary level. My constant goal: building student enthusiasm for thinking about, and valuing written expression. 
  • This is what high energy English classrooms should be about:
  • Student enthusiasm for exploring the beauty and precision of language…
  • Student “ah-ha!” moments as they learn to create increasingly complex and effective sentence patterns…
  • Strengthening student ability to generate richer, more varied sentences that naturally compel writers to provide higher levels of evidence and supporting detail…
  • …And the satisfaction of seeing one’s writing skills grow on a daily basis.
  • Why shouldn’t a writing class be the most exciting class in the entire school?
  • Imagine a selection of sentences written by your 9th-12th graders as part of a short (two paragraph) creative writing assignment entitled “Still Life: An Old Work Shoe”:
  • “…A slothful bootlace curls, loops and winds dronishly through the rusty, metal holes, creating a clustered, knotted look…”
  • “…Its worn, brass eyelets rusting, the dreary shoe tugs toothlessly at a besmirched, spurious lace…”
  • “…Descending and submerging, a criss-cross patterned sole sinks into the damp, boggy soil…”
  • “…A seam, ravelling and slipping, arches around the worn and dusty surface…a mucky, sweat-blemished shoe tongue cowers between two mountains of uplifting leather…”
  • “…A silver, dulled hook, its metal oxidizing, holds out its ends to clasp on to ancient, threadbare laces…”
  • These sentences were crafted by my own regular English class students (grades 9-12) who were half-way through a 9-36 week curriculum that developed voice and fluency at the same time that it developed sentence construction skills.
  • As “regular” (not HONORS) students, they were as reluctant to write and as under-skilled as the majority of our public school students are nowadays.
  • Sentences like these are emblematic of a dramatically heightened student awareness of the precision and descriptive power of language. And this awareness and skill can be developed in ALL your students; even those who come to class with the most elementary writing skills.
  • Using the same step-by-step, mastery learning approach that I have used with over 5,000 students, you will guide your classes through a seamless series of concrete, teachable lessons that lead to sentence construction proficiency. No textbooks are required; no handouts are distributed.
  • Regardless of background or preparation, teachers now have the opportunity to guide students beyond the limited entry level language patterns that they brought with them when they entered the classroom. I invite all teachers of writing–whether novices or experts–to join me on this instructional journey.
  • 7-12 Writing Curriculum:  A 9-36 week writing curriculum that develops high performance writing, reading and thinking skills for all student participants, grades 7-12. The curriculum comes to you as a teacher manual on a CD which you can load onto your hard drive and print out as necessary.
  • Impact for Teachers: Dramatically upgrade your skills as a teacher of writing. Topschools Writing Curriculum guides teachers & students step-by-step through an exciting sequence of short, high interest writing activities that develop voice, fluency, analytical power and sentence construction skills. The curriculum begins with simple concepts and moves both teacher and students forward to increasingly sophisticated sentence proficiencies. Because it uses a mastery learning approach, skills are broken into concrete, specific tasks that are easily demonstrated by students before they move to next steps.
  • Activities are focused, have clear targets, and provide for frequent closure and student demonstration.
  • Oral sharing of student work is a built into the curriculum by design. Such sharing develops confidence, pride in new learning, and jump starts student conversation about what quality writing looks like. Lessons are designed to be taught effectively, whether the teacher is a veteran or a newcomer to composition and sentence construction.
  • I provide one year of unlimited email support in order to guarantee teacher success. Whenever a teacher has questions about the curriculum, about instructional strategies, about next steps, please write and I will respond within 24 hours or less. I also welcome samples of student work so that together we can assess their progress. This curriculum addresses and challenges the full spectrum of student abilities–from those below grade level to those in Honors or Advanced Placement courses.
  • Impact for Students: Weak word choice and sentence construction skills can impose limits on the depth and quality of student thinking. In this curriculum, students learn to design, write and read sentences that force higher order language, translation and thinking skills. Skills like these help students succeed on standardized tests that measure student thinking, writing and reading.
  • Overview of the 7-12 Writing Program:
  • Q: How do students learn?
  • A: Students learn by receiving clear instructions about what is expected, clear examples of what is expected, and numerous in-class opportunities to practice and to share their mastery of learning targets.
  • Q: How do students internalize this learning?
  • A: Repetition and reinforcement are the keys: Clear tactics for sentence construction are presented, and students are obligated to reproduce and share these during class in short, targeted, descriptive writing assignments.
  • Q: How can students buy into this curriculum and its activities?
  • A: Short, very specific, high interest descriptive writing activities create clear targets, and provide quick closure, success and reinforcement. Students can clearly see their writing skills grow on a daily basis.
  • Opportunities for group collaboration create shared discovery and enthusiasm for learning in the classroom.
  • Q: Is this another grammar program? I already have a room full of grammar texts.
  • A: We all do. And we have all tried to use them, or their workbook derivatives at one time or another in order to teach writing skills. Our High School Writing Program has a strong grammatical and sentence construction emphasis, absolutely. Because it is about the English language and its use, the contents of the program, when read as a list of topics, look very much like the contents of a grammar book: verbals, appositives, introductory participial phrases and so on.
  • But here the similarity ends. The 9-12 Writing Curriculum is a method; a way of teaching, a way of practicing, a way of engaging students, and a way of sequencing specific learning activities so that each builds upon what has come before as students journey toward mastery. This mastery learning approach is what has been missing from our instructional practice; and this absence has made writing instruction such a dreary task for so many–especially for students.
  • Q: Can I teach my students these effective writing skills in fewer than 9 weeks? I am feeling pressure from my Principal to create results–and soon!
  • A: The curriculum is set up to provide a systematic, cumulative learning sequence that leads to student writing mastery. My recommendation for first time users is to devote a minimum of thirty minutes per day to the curriculum, and to set a 12-18 week time frame for completion. Once a teacher has taught the full curriculum, he/she may choose, in future years, to implement selected lessons in order to achieve dramatic, short-term writing results.
  • Q: Does this curriculum require any specialized grammatical knowledge on the part of the teacher?
  • A: 7-12 Writing Curriculum is designed to coach both students AND teachers toward writing skill development. A teacher who knows little about sentence structure can teach this program very effectively by staying several lessons ahead of his/her students.
  • Because any great curriculum requires teacher participation, each teacher must become an active participant in the discoveries that students make during class; and each teacher must play a collaborative role in guiding, developing and arbitrating student decisions about what good writing looks like. The one-year’s free email support provides personal guidance for teachers who feel they are on shaky ground when it comes to teaching word choice and sentence structure.
  • Q: What does “one year email support” mean for me as a teacher?
  • A: I am committed to your success as an educator. Purchasers of this program have one year unlimited email support. I will collegially respond to your questions about the curriculum, about sentence structure, about grammar, and about instructional strategies within 24 hours of receipt of your query. Brainstorm and troubleshooting questions are very welcome. Samples of your students’ writing are also welcome if you would like input as to how they are doing–or whether they are doing it right. Your success as a teacher of writing is very important to me.
  • The High School Writing Curriculum is Not A Traditional Approach:
  • Emphasis on in-class laboratory learning
  • Emphasis on interaction, frequent closure, frequent feedback/formative assessment
  • De-emphasis on daily grading and collection of papers. Most student work is done in class and students know instantly how well they have met the goals
  • Emphasis on application of new learning NOW
  • Emphasis on starting with simple concepts and moving to highly challenging complexity
  • Emphasis on short sentence and multiple sentence assignments that target skills and provide quick turnaround and classroom critique
  • Emphasis on “getting it,” “demonstrating it” and “using it”
  • Emphasis on observation & discovery
  • Opportunities for group collaboration, but always an emphasis on individual products and accountability
  • Required classroom materials: One good quality thesaurus for each student. One dictionary per two students.
  • Sample Mastery Targets for Voice, Fluency and Precision
  • Concrete nouns applied
  • Abstract nouns applied
  • Verbs and verbals applied
  • Prepositional phrases & agreement issues
  • Powerful word cache development
  • Effective thesaurus use
  • Troubleshooting six forms of redundancy
  • Pathetic fallacy for voice
  • Deploying parts of speech for voice and precision
  • Powerful introductory & non-essential participial phrases—applied
  • Powerful appositives applied
  • Verb tense mastery—applied
  • Introductory adverb clauses applied for richness & complexity
  • Non essential subordinate clauses applied
  • Sentence marking activities: keep it simple
  • Comma rules applied based on word function and sentence structure
  • Simple, compound & complex sentences—applied and constructed
  • Teacher Comments:
    • “I would definitely recommend it to another teacher!!! I believe it incorporates the essential elements for teaching writing which are giving the students the framework for evaluating their own work, and then it is designed to make them practice what they learn. I especially like how it is designed to make them think about writing in a whole new way. ‘Evocative’ is our new mantra.”
    • “What I liked about this curriculum was it created a systematic, organized approach to writing. I liked how the writing was broken down into specific building blocks that we could practice together.”
    • “At the very beginning of the school year I took one day and had the students write two pages about anything they wanted. I saved these papers and pulled them out after completing the ‘shoe’ assignment. I asked them to evaluate their own paper and come up with at least eight problems…I was VERY EXCITED as I listened to the students evaluate their own work. They were all disgusted and described their writing as ‘kindergarten.’ Several students noticed right off that they hadn’t used a single adjective or adverb! Other students noticed redundancy in their word choices and sentence structure…So when I think about specific gains that my students have made, the biggest stride is that they are starting to evaluate their own work and they have a framework for evaluating their work.”
    • “[My students] have a new awareness of what makes an interesting sentence…I think it is a huge benefit that I can say to the students, ‘use a past participle in this sentence’ and they know what I mean. it is also helpful that I can point out to them, when they have written a failed ‘its variation’, “where is your subject?” Where is your verb, and they can go back and study the sentence and fix the problem.”
    • “Hi Bruce, thought I would check in again. We just finished up the first comma rules. I really enjoyed teaching these because the kids were able to write some interesting sentences. I had them write three sentences, all on the same topic, one with an IPP, an NEPP, and an ‘its variation.’ We spent a whole day on these, then I had the students present them orally, then I graded them, handed them back and had the students improve them. I was so pleased to see the improvement through the whole process. I think the students actually enjoyed the process as well because they were ‘lighting’ up when I talked with them individually about tone, consistency between word choices, adding additional adverbs and adjectives for interest, etc. It was really fun.”
  • Writing Curriculum CD: Teacher guide to a seamless series of learning activities that develop proficiency in sentence constructi  
      • “I wish I had time to compose a more detailed email concerning my use of the course. I’ve followed it carefully and learned a great deal. I’m currently grading their Messy Square Foot assignments and previously, students used a vintage backpack for the old boot assignment. Recently we took a short break and used what we’ve learned to redo a bulletin board in my room to create a Creative Writing center. Students interviewed each other and created a microbiography, a single sentence which followed all the “rules” we’ve learned so far, contained an Items in a Series, an IPP or NEPP, an appositive and revealed the most salient characteristics of the classmate they interviewed. Each student then brought in a picture of themselves “in action” and we read our microbiographies aloud in class and then mounted them on nice card stock and posted them on the creative writing bulletin board with their pictures. It’s quite nice. I’ll have to send you an example or two and a picture of the finished bulletin board.”

The Power of a Seamless Curriculum

I began my career as Sammamish H.S. which had a large veteran staff. Our curriculum at that time was a series of quarter-long electives.

Because we had eight to ten full and part time teachers in the department, it was possible for a student to journey from grade 10-12 without ever having had an English teacher for more than a nine week period. This is an extreme case that probably no longer exists in schools today. But it is useful to refer to it, because it brings the issue of continuity and consistency into heightened focus.

Though my departmental colleagues were all expert practitioners, we had few (if any) conversations about expectations, or about the ways that electives might be arranged in a sequence that developed skills and knowledge in a systematic way. We did have an agreement on which texts could be taught at which level…but the most important question– “What skills are we developing as we teach a text?”– had not been formally agreed to.

As a result, students did not have the benefit of reading, writing and thinking activities that were consistently taught and reinforced from teacher to teacher and from year to year. Just as problematic, the literary works they did read at each level were there because of teacher preference; not because they were logical extensions of essential questions that had been covered in preceding classes.

As a way of dealing with this discontinuity, I developed a two year Humanities course (not “courses”) wherein successful completion of the first year was a prerequisite for enrolling in the second.

Immediately after launching this two-year program I discovered how vristy football coaches felt when their first-string juniors returned to the squad for another year.

For my second-year students, the rules and procedures were understood at the outset; the expectations for practice, participation and performance were givens; and previously learned bread and butter plays (writing skills, essential questions, themes) presented themselves anew for more mature analysis and for ever more perfect execution.

They had returned to the same class in order to experience the second half of a continuous curriculum.

This two-year relationship was powerful–not only for students who relished taking essential ideas to depth, but also for the student who was 256th in a class of 300, but who nevertheless could find his footing on the scaffold that an intentional curriculum can provide.

I carried this idea of continuity to Bellevue International, but was able to extend it much further. We had designed a 6-12 school, and opened in 1991 with 150 sixth and seventh graders.

This is what was so powerful about combining long-term relationships with a curriculum that was designed to focus on essential questions, and upon the extension, application, elaboration and refinement of these up through all the grades. During the two year period that my students were with me, I could coach them, charge them up with fundamental skills and basic conceptual knowledge, teach them the intricacies of sentence structure and paragraph formation (so that their writing was not only correct, but also so that it could carry the weight of their increasingly complex and sophisticated thoughts), introduce them to the Socratic method, and give them a powerful jump start on their abstract and analytical thinking.

And most important: I could begin to imbue them with a belief in the validity of their own critical powers; and instill in them the conviction that the world they encountered was amenable to reasonable explanation–not mysterious–and that the history of human civilization and cultural experimentation was theirs to understand and to explore.

The goal of the Humanities Strand at Bellevue International School (as well as at Kirkland International School) was to produce students who were realistic, analytical, and sensitive to the artistic and cultural products that have been created by their fellow human beings, both ancient and modern.

In addition to a substantial encounter with literature in all its forms, my Humanities students also studied the fine and architectural arts, the histories and distinguishing characteristics of political systems, and the history and characteristics of thought–both philosophical and religious.

The Humanities curriculum’s fundamental organizing principle: a belief that all areas of study in its domain can be referenced to one another–either as a derivative, a departure, a contradiction, a by-product, a corollary, or a transformation and extension of basic, initial premises.

When a high school Humanities student read Death of a Salesman, he or she was also expected to reference passages in Miller’s play to Ovid’s “Four Ages”(introduced in 7th grade), to mythological themes (introduced in 7th grade), to religious sacrifice, to the origins of tragedy (both introduced in 9th grade), to Platonic idealism (introduced in 10th grade), to Pyrrhonic skepticism (introduced in 10th), and to a neo-Romantic celebration of the attractiveness of nature, as opposed to the impress of civilization.

This unification of works that are separated in space and time–by both thousands of years and thousands of miles–helps us to understand the ways in which they participate in the on-going artistic and reflective narrative of human culture–a system of artifacts, representations and pronouncements that springs not only from our nature, but also from a fundamental set of concerns that we all share. These essential experiences and themes were applied and extended year after year, with the result that they became the tools and instruments of analysis–the knowledge of the history of a practice or idea; the knowledge of its make-up and origins; the knowledge of its various manifestations through time. We call this knowledge the ability to view culture “sub specie aeternitatis”–under the aspect of eternity, and under the aspect of its participation in pan-cultural, thoroughly human contexts and forms.

Imagine a Bellevue International, and Lake Washington Community School School student immersed in a class wherein students and teacher might be engaged in an animated discussion of Keats“Ode on a Grecian Urn, linking it back to the legend of Canute, to the plenum of Parmenides, to the wisdom of Aeschylus.

Or where the study of “Oedipus Rex” interfaces with the “Book of Job“, as well as with the theory of tragedy and its Dionysian origins.

Or where a study of Arthur Miller’s “Death of a Salesman” ranges back to the “Epic of Gilgamesh“; forward to Osirian resurrection mythology; forward again to Beowulf, and forward again to Rousseau, Thoreau and Ray Bradbury’s “Sound of Thunder“.

Or where students can produce a graph that maps the inductive/deductive spiral of an essay by Mo-Tzu.

Or where students animatedly discuss the naturalism of Crane’s “Red Badge of Courage“; or trace Heracleitan influences in Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 60”; or make connections between the Bhagavad Gita, the neo-Platonism of Plotinus and the “Immortality Ode” of William Wordsworth.

Or where students select, edit and perform their own ensemble Reader’s Theater performances, fusing selections from the work of Jack London, Publius Ovidius Naso, The Old Testament, Tennessee Williams, Kurt Vonnegut, and Shirley Jackson.

Or where students, on demand and as early as 7 grade, can write effective appositives, introductory adverb clauses, non-essential participial phrases in several formulations, and a variety of sentence patterns–and know full well what these and other grammatical and structural terms mean.

The achievement reflected in my students’ test scores at Bellevue International School was not an accident of demographics–which is why I have arrayed these scores against those earned by students within the same district.

Instead, their achievements reflected what articulated learning experiences can produce: a familiar neighborhood of practices, skill development and concepts that are carried forward, and that build trust in the learning environment.

I share this story because it is a microcosm of what schools can become.

Though few teachers will ever have the luxury (and the burden) of being solely responsible for a student’s secondary preparation grades 6-12, they can create the same continuity and consistency within their departments and schools.

The following are some of the prompts that my students have been asked to respond to in their Humanities classes–often as in-class, timed writes.

For the in the knowm, class timed writes are the true indicators of proficiency. Take-home papers and long term research assignments are of neglible value compared to these. Teachers who narrow the focus, tie writing assignments to actual in-class activities, and create pointed writing prompts based on class discussion side-step plagiarism issues at the same time that they improve their formative assessment practices. In my view, the vast majority of papers written in an English class should be of this variety–and they should be less than one page in length. This length is easier to grade, and provides quicker turnaround for correction of student writing.

On Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura Lines 241-300: What law is Lucretius attempting to establish? Which piece of evidence, from among the many that he offers, seems to be the most interesting or persuasive? Quote those lines and then compose a paragraph that demonstrates how those lines provide support for this “law.”

On Mo Tzu: Find the “radical” or “extraordinary” thesis at the heart of this passage. Compose a paragraph, weaving three quotes, that describes and highlights the uniqueness of this idea of his. Do not indicate whether you agree; just describe his view.

On Yang Chu and The Book of Job:Weaving three quotes from Job 21:7, describe whether this author is in fundamental agreement with the selection from Yang Chu.

On the Hymn of Akhenaten: Compose a paragraph that identifies and then discusses the chief similarity between this document and Francis of Assisi’s Canticle to the Sun. Weave three quotes into your answer.

On the Lottery: Compose a paragraph that describes the etiology of (and metaphorical efficacy of) this ritual, especially as it is allied with the seasonal and vegetative pattern of the monomyth.

On Deer in the Works: Describe this story as a metaphor for the journey that humans undertook during the neolithic revolution. Utilize metaphors and structures from Ovid’s “Four Ages,” as well as from The Book of Genesis.

On Brave New World: Identify and describe the fundamental similarity that exists between the social structure depicted in this work and the constitution of Lycurgus as described by Plutarch. As you do so, refer intelligently to Plato’s Republic.

On Metaphysics: Describe the relationship between the philosophy of the Gita, Plotinus‘ theory of knowledge, and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Weave three quotes from Shelley’s Adonais in your answer.

On the Eden myth in Genesis: Compose two paragraphs, one of which interprets this story as an ontogenetic metaphor, and the other which interprets it as a metaphor for the neolithic revolution–in the particularly Ovidian sense that we have used in this class.

On Lin Yutang: Early in this century, Lin Yutang wrote this introduction to a collection of Chinese literature that he knew would be widely read in the West. Identify his main concern and compose a two page typewritten paper that explains and evaluates his idea. Weave a minimum of five quotes.

On Confucius: What role do participles play in the first half of this passage; what role in the second? Please note that a dramatic participial shift occurs.

On Pericles’ Funeral Oration: Identify and quote ten Periclean assertions about the qualities of Athenian citizens. Using the same number of assertions, selected from Ayn Rand’s Anthem, compose ten brief paragraphs that clarify the contradictions that exist between the values of the “collective” and the values of the Athenian citizen, as described by Pericles.

On Confucius: Which portion of this passage is inductive? How so? Which portion is deductive? How so?

On Death of a Salesman: If Bill Oliver is Zeus atop Mt Olympus, and if Biff is Prometheus stealing fire (Oliver’s pen), what great gift does Biff bring to humanity after he returns to earth, i.e. runs down “eleven flights of stairs”? Weave three quotes for this in-class answer.

On Confucius: Citing at least five examples, describe the way that the use of linking verbs in the last half of the passage contribute directly to the thesis that we have been exploring in the previous discussion.

On Siddhartha: Identify the epiphanic vision that Siddhartha experiences during the last third of the novel. Compose a paragraph, the topic of which precisely identifies what it is that he learns–especially as it may involve a re-definition of the “hero.”

On The Bacchae:Weaving four quotes from the choral speech on pg. 72, compose a paragraph that identifies and describes the fundamental human benefit derived by maenadic participation in Dionysian rites.

On Confucius: Find six proverbs which emphasize the importance of the local or that which is within reach (achievable), versus that which is fantastic, distant or beyond reach (remote).

On Sonnet 60: Weaving four quotes, describe this poem as a confirmation of the philosophy of Heracleitus.

On Confucius: Find two proverbs that seem to disagree with the values that Ben Franklin espouses in Poor Richard’s Almanack.

On Gilgamesh: Contrast the two positions re. death and acceptance thereof that occur on pg. 45-6. Which character, Enkidu or Gilgamesh, seems to evince the greater acceptance of death? Which seems most bent upon defying the natural order of things? Weave four quotes.

On Gilgamesh: Discuss the fatal–and flawed– interpretation of the dream on page 53. Comment on the author’s intention, especially if Humbaba is now read as a metaphor for nature itself…Weave three quotes.

Durant’s Essay on Plato: According to Durant, what accounts for the fact that skepticism flourished in Athens? Develop this in a short paragraph, weaving three quotes from the text.

On Freud’s The Future of an Illusion: Pg. 53: “This would be an important advance along the road which leads to becoming reconciled to the burden of civilization.” Explain this passage, drawing elements of your answer from the immediately preceding pages. Weave four quotes.

On Wayfarer: Describe the “contest” between the old man and the officer in metaphorical terms. Clearly indicate the roots of this primitive/civilized antagonism in the topic. Weave three quotes.

On Sound of Thunder: Compose a paragraph that describes Bradbury’s use of either: motion, color/light, sound, feel, taste or anatomy/physicality. Make sure the topic identifies the contribution that this imagery makes to the story. Weave four quotes.

On Red Badge of Courage: Describe the role that ego defense mechanisms such as displacement, sublimation, reaction formation and identification with the aggressor play in chaps. 5-13.

                                   My Poetry Memorized Poems To This Year

Chimney SweeperWm Blake

Ode on a Grecian Urn – John Keats

Astrophel & StellaSir Philip Sidney

Musee des Beaux Arts – W.H. Auden

Ode on Melancholy– John Keats

Sonnet 29 When In Disgrace..– Wm Shakespeare

The Force That Through The Green Fuse — Dylan Thomas

The Chimney Sweeper–William Blake

Tiger, Tiger— William Blake

Cupid & My Campaspe — John Lyly, Edward de Vere

In My Craft or Sullen Art–Dylan Thomas

Cupid & My Campaspe ( aka: Apelles’ Song) Lyly / De Vere

Euclid Alone Has Looked on Beauty Bare (7)–Edna St Vincent Millay

Sonnet 130 — Wm Shakespeare

Ozymandias–Percy Shelley

Sonnet 116– Wm Shakespeare

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night–Dylan Thomas

Musee des Beaux Arts– W.H. Auden

Astrophel & Stella — Sir Philip Sidney

The Force That Through the Green Fuse — Dylan Thomas

Ode on Melancholy 3–John Keats

Flee From Me That Sometime Did Me Seek –Thomas Wyatt the Elder

Sonnet 60–Like as the WavesShakespeare

Ode on Melancholy– John Keats

Convergence of the Twain–Thomas Hardy

Ode a Grecian Urn John Keats–

Contact: bruceesaari@gmail.com

Dr. Bruce Saari teacher